Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 80540 (KAR)

DINESH SUVARNA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/7895/2022 · 2025-11-06

E S Indiresh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44809 WP No. 7895 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.7895 OF 2022 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN: 1. DINESH SUVARNA AGED 59 YEARS S/O LATE DEVARAJ SUVARNA R/AT VIMAL COMLEX POST SHIRVA - 574116 KAUP TALUK UDUPI DISTRICT. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SUDESH KUMAR ACHARYA U., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOME VIKASA SOUDHA BENGALURU - 560001. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE BANNANAJE UDUPI 576101 UDUPI DISTRICT. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KAUP POLICE STATION Digitally signed by ARUNKUMAR M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44809 WP No. 7895 of 2022 KAPU - 574118 KAUP TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT. 4. M/S KUBER ENTERPRISES VIMAL COMPLEX NEAR BUS STAND SHIVRA 574116 KAUP TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETORS. a. HARIPRASAD SALIAN S/O SIDDUR POOJARY AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS. b. SUVASINI W/O HARIPRASAD SALIAN AGED 35 YEARS …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHANTESH SHETTAR, AGA FOR R1 TO R3; SRI. GIRISH KUMAR B.M., ADVOCATE FOR R4(a) AND R4(b); R4 SERVED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ENDORSEMENT DATED 12.08.2021 ON THE FILE OF THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,KAUP CIRCLE,KAUP,UDUPI DISTRICT,VIDE ANNEXURE-F AND TO DECLARE THE SAME AS ILLEGAL AND UNSUSTAINABLE UNDER LAW; AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44809 WP No. 7895 of 2022 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. In this writ petition, the petitioner is assailing the endorsement dated 12.08.2021 (Annexure-F), wherein, respondent No.3 has closed the complaint made by the petitioner herein against respondent No.4. In this regard, learned Additional Government Advocate submitted that the respondent - authorities have registered FIR in Crime No.90/2023 of Shirva Police Station, Kaup Taluk, Udupi District, and in that view of the matter, the respondent - authorities have taken cognizance in the matter. 3. In that view of the matter, I am of the view that, the relief sought for by the petitioner in this writ petition, does not survive for consideration. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE sac