- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47774 WP No. 21963 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 21963 OF 2019 (LB-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SUNDARESHA C.A. S/O ANANTHARAMAN AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS KLASSIK LANDMARK SY NO.34/10 FLAT NO.4C, BLUE BELL TOWERS JUNANSANDARA OFF SARJAPURA ROAD NEXT TO AMRITA ENGINEERING COLLEGE BANGALORE-35 2. RUCHIN JOSHI AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, S/O SHIVDATT JOSHI KLASSIK LANDMARK SY NO.34/10 FLAT NO.7E, ASTER TOWERS JUNANSANDARA OFF SARJAPURA ROAD NEXT TO AMRITA ENGINEERING COLLEGE BANGALORE-35 3. KLASSIK LANDMARK APARTMENT SY NO.10/1 AND 11/1 KALENA AGRAHARA NEAR MEENAKSHI TEMPLE BANNERUGHATTA ROAD BY ITS MANAGER C.A.SUNDARESHA …PETITIONERS (BY MS. YUKTHA N., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. MITHUN GERAHALLI A., ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47774 WP No. 21963 of 2019 AND: 1. SECRETARY PANCHAYATH RAJ DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560001. 2. PACHAYATH RAJ DEVELOPMENT OFFICE PANCHAYATH PDO HALANAYAKANAHALLI JUNANASANDARA BANGALORE-560029 3. INDUS TOWERS PVT. LTD. 12, TOWER D, SUBRAMANYA ARCADE 7TH FLOOR, BANNERGHATTA BANGALORE-560029 BY ITS MANAGER …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B. BOPANNA, ADDITIONAL GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.1; SRI. K.V. LAKSHMANACHAR, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.2; SRI. GURURAJ D.M., ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.2 TO STOP THE RESPONDENT NO.3 FROM ERECTING THE ILLEGAL MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATION TOWER OPPOSITE TO KLASSIK LANDMARK APARTMENT BUILDING SITUATED IN HALAMANAYAKANAHALLI, OFF SARJAPURA ROAD, WITHIN 9 METERS RADIUS AND FURTHER WITHOUT A PRIOR APPROVAL FROM THE RESPONDENT NO.2 AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47774 WP No. 21963 of 2019 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo to withdraw the writ petition. 2. The memo is taken on record. 3. In view of the memo, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. In view of dismissal of the writ petition, all pending I.As., if any, do not survive for consideration and the same stand dismissed. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE PMR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 59