Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8052 (MAD)

SHESAMMAL v. ARULMOZHI INVESTMENTS

CRP(MD)/310/2025 · 2026-07-02

S Sounthar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.310 to 317, 663 and 664 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 02.07.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR C.R.P.(PD)(MD)Nos.310 to 317, 663 and 664 of 2025 and C.M.P.(MD)No.1804, 1807, 1811 and 3578 of 2023 1.Shesammal 2.V.Suganya 3.V.Divya 4.V.Jesintha Merry ... Petitioners in all C.R.Ps. Vs Arulmozhi Investments, Represented by its Managing Partner R.Kathiresan, Door No.43 Padma Tower 4th Floor, Coimbatore Road, Karur, Karur District. ... Respondent in all C.R.Ps. COMMON PRAYER: Civil Revision Petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the fair and decretal order dated 12.09.2024 passed in I.A.Nos.59 and 63 of 2022 in O.S.No.838 of 2012, in I.A.Nos.60 and 64 of 2022 in O.S.No.839 of 2012, in I.A.Nos.61 and 65 of 2022 in O.S.No.840 of 2022, I.A.Nos.62 and 66 of 2022 in O.S.No.841 of 2012 and I.A.Nos.78 and 79 of 2022 in O.S.No.879 of 2012 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Madurai. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.310 to 317, 663 and 664 of 2025 For Petitioners : Mr.B.Rajesh Saravanan (In all C.R.Ps) For Respondent : Mr.A.K.Gopalan for (In all C.R.Ps.) Mr.G.Ramapandian COMMON ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and also the respondent would submit that the dispute between the petitioners and the respondent had been settled in terms of the Joint Compromise Memo dated 02.07.2026. It is further submitted that the petitioners totally paid a sum of Rs.23,00,000/- (Rupees Twenty Three lakhs) to the respondent and the same has been acknowledged by the respondent. It is also stated that the respondent agreed to file necessary memo in execution petitions pending on the file of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Madurai to remove the attachment over the property of the petitioners. It was also agreed that the respondent shall file necessary Out of Court Settlement memo in the execution petition pending on the file of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Madurai. The petitioners as well as the Managing Partner of the respondent firm R.Kathiresan are present before this Court. The parties are identified by the respective counsels. In the Joint Compromise Memo, all the petitioners and the Managing partner of the 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.310 to 317, 663 and 664 of 2025 respondent firm affixed their signatures. The Joint Compromise Memo is counter signed by the respective counsels. Hence, this Court is inclined to record the Joint Compromise Memo dated 02.07.2026. 2. All the Civil Revision Petitions are disposed of in terms of the Joint Compromise Memo dated 02.07.2026. The Joint Compromise Memo dated 02.07.2026 shall form part of the order passed by this Court. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 02.07.2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No vsm To 1. The Principal Subordinate Court, Madurai. 2.The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.310 to 317, 663 and 664 of 2025 S.SOUNTHAR, J. vsm C.R.P.(PD)(MD)Nos.310 to 317, 663 and 664 of 2025 02.07.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis