COMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT SHREE MAHALAXMI BHAKT MANDAL SEWA SAMITI THROUGH ITS SECRETARY MR. VIKAS MI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIC/25126/2025 · 2025-07-30
Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 80500 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 80500 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:128087 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 25126 of 2025 Petitioner :- Committee Of Management Shree Mahalaxmi Bhakt Mandal Sewa Samiti Through Its Secretary Mr. Vikas Mittal Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Akhand Pratap Singh,Saurabh Pandey,Shaurya Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking for the following relief:-
" 1. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent n.2 to register the list of office bearer pursuant to the election dated 05.01.2025 (Annexure No.3 to the writ petition). II. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding/directing the respondent n.2 to take appropriate decision pursuant to the notice dated 03.06.2025 and 23.06.2025 (Annexure Nos.4&6 to the writ petition respectively). III. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding/directing the respondent n.2 to decide the representation dated 01.07.2025 (Annexure No.7 to the writ petition) expeditiously within stipulated time."
2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner without entering into the merits of the case made innocuous prayer that he may be permitted to file fresh representation before respondent no.2 and a direction may be issued to him to decide the same in time bound manner. 3. Sri Saurabh, learned standing counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents vehemently opposed the petition on merit, but has not opposed the prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. 4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Sri Saurabh, learned Standing Counsel and perused the contents made in the writ petition. 5. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer of the petitioner as no objection made by learned Standing Counsel. Petitioner is directed to file a fresh detailed representation along with the present writ petition and certified copy of this order before respondent no.2 Deputy Registrar (Firm Societies and Chits), 339/12A, Avas Vikas Colony, Sikandara Yojna, Agra within 10 days. After receiving the said representation, the respondent no.2 is directed to decide the said representation in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the said representation. 6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of.
Order Date :- 31.7.2025 AKT (Chandra Dhari Singh, J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad