1 2025:CGHC:8268-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 558 of 2025 S. Meghna D/o Chandrashekhar Rao Aged About 27 Years R/o 94/2 Loko Colony, Near Kali Mandir Gudiyari Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station- Torva, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Rajkumar Chauhan S/o Sarthi Chauhan Aged About 28 Years R/o Near Dhan Mandi Torva, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. (Complainant) ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Krishna Tandon, Advocate For Respondent No.1 : Mr. Hariom Rai, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No.2 : Mr. Sanjay Agrawal, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 18.02.2025 1. Heard Mr. Krishna Tandon, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. Hariom Rai, learned Panel Lawyer, appearing for the ANURADHA TIWARI Digitally signed by ANURADHA TIWARI Date: 2025.02.18 17:19:54 +0530 2 State/respondent No.1 and Mr. Sanjay Agrawal, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer: “It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash first information report (F.I.R.) 281/2024, registered for commission of offence U/s 318(4), 319(2), 351(3), 3(5) of Bharatiya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in Police Station Torwa, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, (C.G.) and if any other consequential proceedings arises then that too may be quashed, in the interest of justice.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present FIR is to be quashed on the ground that the petitioner and respondent No.2 have amicably settled their dispute and the compromise agreement has been filed as Annexure A/2 alongwith this petition. 4. Learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2 submits that he has earlier sought time to file power on behalf of respondent No.2, but he could not file the same due to unavoidable circumstances. 5. Since there is no submission on behalf of respondent No.2 that the parties have entered into an amicable settlement, we deem it 3 appropriate to direct the parties to appear before the Investigating Officer concerned who shall verify the compromise agreement and file a Final Report under Section 193(3) of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 before the competent Court within a period of four weeks from today, in accordance with law. 6. In view of the above, the instant Cr.M.P. is disposed of. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Anu