Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 80499 (KAR)

MUSTAQ PASHA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/29177/2023 · 2025-10-08

E S Indiresh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39514 WP No.29177 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.29177 OF 2023 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN: 1. MUSTAQ PASHA S/O SHEIK HUSSAIN @ NAWAB JAN, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, NO.477/1308 DAYANDANGAR SIDDAPURA 1ST BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560011. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SYED UMMER, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO HOME DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560001. 2. COMMISSIONER OF POLICE BANGALORE CITY, INFANTRY ROAD, BENGALURU - 560001. 3. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE JAYANAGAR DIVISION, SOUTH END CIRCLE, BENGALURU - 560004. Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39514 WP No.29177 of 2023 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SIDDAPURA POLICE STATION, JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560011. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO THE RESPONDENT NO.3 TO DELETE THE NAME O9F THE PETITIONER FROM THE ROWDY LIST VIDE NO.28/21 DATED 10.07.2021 BEFORE THE SIDDAPURA POLICE STATION IN THE ENDS OF JUSTICE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. The petition is listed for 6th time for non- compliance of the office objections. Despite having been granted sufficient time, the learned counsel for the petitioner has failed to comply with the office objections. By order dated 10.03.2025, this Court had granted a final opportunity of two weeks to rectify the said objections. This non- - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39514 WP No.29177 of 2023 compliance indicates that the petitioner has no genuine intent to diligently pursue the matter. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non- compliance with office objections. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 23