Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 80493 (KAR)

SRI SHANTHASREE HARSHA v. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

WP/8979/2016 · 2025-07-23

M Nagaprasanna

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28014 WP No. 8979 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 8979 OF 2016 (LA-BDA) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. SHANTHASREE HARSHA, S/O LATE C. LAKSHMIPATHY, AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.49, SAPTAGIRE, 3RD CROSS, 2ND MAIN, CHBS LAYOUT, CHANDRA LAYOUT, VIJAYA NAGAR, BENGALURU – 560 040. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. LOKESH M., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER , T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARAPARK WEST, BENGALURU – 560 020. 2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISTION OFFICER, BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARAPARK WEST, BENGALURU – 560 020 3. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU – 560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. UNNIKRISHNAN M., ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2 SRI. NEELAKANTAPPA PUJAR, HCGP FOR R3) Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28014 WP No. 8979 of 2016 THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS FROM THE RESPONDENTS; ISSUE WRIT OR ORDER QUASHING THE IMPUGNED FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 15.07.1971 ISSUED BY THE R-3 [ANNEX-A] AND CONSEQUENTLY DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT SCHEDULED PROPERTIES LAPSED AND FURTHER DECLARE THAT THE RESPONDENTS HAVE LOST THE RIGHT TO ACQUIRE THE LAND BELONGING TO THE PETITIONER AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner files a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition. The memo so filed reads as follows: "The Petitioner submits that he is not willing to prosecute the above case any further and craves leave of this Hon'ble Court to withdraw the above case. Therefore, this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to PERMIT the Petitioner to withdraw the above matter and DISPOSE OFF the above matter as WITHDRAWN, in the interest of justice and equity." In terms of memo, the petition is disposed as withdrawn. SD/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE CBC List No.: 2 Sl No.: 1