NARINDER KUMAR AND OTHERS v. VANDANA RANI AND ANOTHER
CR/4529/2025 · 2025-07-21
Vikas Bahl
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 80489 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 80489 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (131) CR-4529-2025 Date of decision: - 21.07.2025 Narinder Kumar and others ....Petitioners Versus Vandana Rani and another .....Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present:- Mr. Vipan Kumar Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners. **** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL)
1. Present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the impugned order dated 23.05.2025 (Annexure P-5) passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Camp at Balachaur, whereby an application filed by respondent No.1 for direction to the petitioners to produce the minors has been allowed.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that in view of the law laid down by the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in case titled as
“Dr. Geetanjali Aggarwal Vs. Dr. Manoj Aggarwal”, reported as 2024 (4) RCR (Civil) 657, the petitioners be permitted to withdraw the present revision petition with liberty to file an appeal in accordance with law.
3. Dismissed as withdrawn, with the aforesaid liberty.
( VIKAS BAHL ) July 21, 2025
JUDGE naresh.k Whether reasoned/speaking? Yes/No Whether reportable? Yes/No NARESH KUMAR 2025.07.22 10:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document/judgement