APHC010084922008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3397] WEDNESDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO FIRST APPEAL NO: 179/2008 Between: 1. MR. T. HARINARAYANA, S/O T. MOHANA RANGAM SCIENTIST NGRI, R/O D.NO. 1-49/6F, PLOT NO. 125 STREET NO. 3, SURYANAGAR COLONY, UPPAL, GREATER HYDERABAD. ...APPELLANT AND 1. MR T LAKSHMINARAYANA, S/O T. MOHANA RANGAM ADVOCATE R/O FLAT NO. 416, SOVEREIGN SHELTER APARTMENTS LAKDIKAPOOL GREATER HYDERABAD. 2. T MOHANA RANGAM, S/O LATE SRI T. GOVINDASWAMY CHETTI ADVOCATE R/O D.NO. 10-2-87, THIRTHAKATTA STREET TIRUPATHI CHITTOOR DIST. 3. T MANOHAR BABU, S/O T. MOHANA RANGAM SENIOR GEOLOGIST R/O FLAT NO. 102, P-69 OPP TO TIRUMALA APARTMENTS ARUNODAYA COLONY, MADHAPUR, GREATER HYDERABAD. 4. T RAVISHANKER, S/O T. MOHANA RANGAM EMPLOYEE R/O D.NO. 10-2-87, THIRTHAKATTA STREET TIRUPATHI CHITTOOR DIST. 5. T SUDHAKAR BABU, S/O T. MOHANA RANGAM PRIVATE SERVICE R/O FLAT NO. G1, AKASH BHAVANI RESIDENCY PLOT NO. 10, NEHRU NAGAR, BACKSIDE OF NIRMAN TOWERS 6. SMT T PADMALOCHANA DEVI, W/O R. SAMPATH KUMAR HOUSEWIFE R/O D.NO. D-4, III FLOOR, 184 LAKEVIEW ROAD, MAMBALAM, CHENNAI TAMILNADU STATE. ...RESPONDENT(S): appeal against the judgment & decree dt. 11-10-07 in OS NO. 40/98 on the file of the Court of the IV Addl. District Judge, Tirupati IA NO: 1 OF 2008(ASMP 70 OF 2008 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of the certified copy of the judgment and decree dt. 11- 10-07 in OS No. 40/98 on the file of the IV Addl. District Judge, Tirupati Counsel for the Appellant: 1. SRICHARAN TELAPROLU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. RAVULA NAGARJUNA 2. . 3. P NAGA PRADEEP 4. M SHIVA KUMAR The Court made the following: JUDGMENT: 1. Learned counsel for the appellant would submit that he had filed a memo dated 08.07.2025, vide U.S.R.No.68390 of 2025 before the Registry, stating that the appellant is intending to withdraw the present appeal and the same is placed on record. The representation made by the learned counsel for the appellant is recorded. 2. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the appellant, the Appeal Suit is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE V. GOPALA KRISHNA RAO Date.09.07.2025 CVD