AT CHANDIGARH **** 226 RSA-5105-2011 Date of Decision.:17.07.2025 Kaushalya Devi Appellant Vs. Mohd. Hanif Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present: None for the appellant. Mr. Talim Hussain, Advocate for the respondent. **** DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL) There is no representaon on behalf of the appellant nor any applicaon has been moved to implead the LRs of the deceased- appellant. Perusal of the paper-book would reveal that suit for seeking decree of possession of suit property filed by plainff Smt. Kaushlya Devi was dismissed by the trial Court on 08.02.2010 and the appeal filed by the said plainff was dismissed by the first Appellate Court on 25.07.2011. This appeal was filed by plainff Smt. Kaushalya Devi against concurrent findings of the Courts below. On 21.05.2024, it was informed by learned counsel for the appellant that sole appellant Smt. Kaushalya Devi had expired. Time was sought to move appropriate applicaon to implead her LRs. Despite granng sufficient opportunies, no such applicaon so as to bring on record the LRs of the deceased- appellant has been moved. NEETIKA TUTEJA 2025.07.17 17:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document RSA-5105-2011 Today nobody is present on behalf of the appellant/her LRs. In the aforesaid circumstances, the present appeal stands dismissed in default for want of prosecuon. ( DEEPAK GUPTA ) JUDGE July 17, 2025 Neeka Tuteja Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No NEETIKA TUTEJA 2025.07.17 17:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document