Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 80466 (PNJ)

RAJINDER KUMAR ALIAS RAJINDER KUMAR BHATIA v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRWP/7773/2025 · 2025-07-29

Rajesh Bhardwaj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRWP-7773 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 112 Rajinder Kumar @ Rajinder Kumar Bhatia State of Punjab and others Coram : Present: Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (Oral) 1. the Constitution of India for issuance of directions to respondent nos.2 & 3 for protection of life and liberty of the petitioner apprehending respondent nos. (Annexure P- 2. respondent no.5 are partners in two n business rivalry, now respondent no.5 is harassing the petitioner by sending goons to his office. In support of the averments made, he has drawn attention of this Court to the CCTV footages (Annexures P having no other option, the petitioner ha (Annexure P taken so far by them. 773-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Rajinder Kumar @ Rajinder Kumar Bhatia Versus of Punjab and others Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj Mr. Krishan Singh Dadwal, Advocate, for the petitioner. **** Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (Oral) The petitioner has filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of directions to respondent nos.2 & 3 for protection of life and liberty of the petitioner apprehending danger at the behest of respondent no respondent nos.2 and 3 to take action on his representation dated 04.07.2025 -11). Learned counsel for the petitioner respondent no.5 are partners in two nursing institut business rivalry, now respondent no.5 is harassing the petitioner by sending goons to his office. In support of the averments made, he has drawn attention of this Court to the CCTV footages (Annexures P having no other option, the petitioner had filed representation dated 04.07.2025 (Annexure P-11) to respondent nos.2 and 3 but no positive action has been taken so far by them. - 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-7773-2025 Decided on:29.07.2025 Rajinder Kumar @ Rajinder Kumar Bhatia ...Petitioner ...Respondents Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj , Advocate, The petitioner has filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of directions to respondent nos.2 & 3 for protection of life and liberty of the petitioner and his family members who are ehest of respondent nos.4 and 5 and also to direct on his representation dated 04.07.2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner and ursing institutes and because of the business rivalry, now respondent no.5 is harassing the petitioner by sending goons to his office. In support of the averments made, he has drawn attention of this Court to the CCTV footages (Annexures P-7 & P-9). It is submitted that filed representation dated 04.07.2025 11) to respondent nos.2 and 3 but no positive action has been ...Petitioner ...Respondents The petitioner has filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of directions to respondent nos.2 & 3 for are and also to direct on his representation dated 04.07.2025 submits that the petitioner and and because of the business rivalry, now respondent no.5 is harassing the petitioner by sending goons to his office. In support of the averments made, he has drawn attention s submitted that filed representation dated 04.07.2025 11) to respondent nos.2 and 3 but no positive action has been VINOD KUMAR 2025.07.31 10:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-7773 3. 4. respondent-State 5. records, especially CCTV footages (Annexures P apprehension of the petitioner appears of the present Police, Ludhiana (Annexure P week from today members, if any threat to July 29, 2025 vinod* 773-2025 Notice of motion to the official respondents only. Mr. J.S. Arora, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the State and prays for time to have instructions After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and perusing the records, especially CCTV footages (Annexures P apprehension of the petitioner appears to be genuine. In view thereof, present petition with a direction to respondent no. Police, Ludhiana to take into consideration the representation P-11) of the petitioner and decide the same within a period of one week from today and also grant protection , if any threat to their lives and liberty is perceived. , 2025 Whether Speaking/Reasoned: Whether Reportable: - 2 - Notice of motion to the official respondents only. Mr. J.S. Arora, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the and prays for time to have instructions. hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and perusing the records, especially CCTV footages (Annexures P-7 and P-9), prima facie to be genuine. In view thereof, I dispose petition with a direction to respondent no.3- Commissioner of the representation dated 04.07.2025 and decide the same within a period of one grant protection to the petitioner and his family and liberty is perceived. (Rajesh Bhardwaj) Judge Whether Speaking/Reasoned: NO/YES NO/YES Mr. J.S. Arora, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and perusing the a facie I dispose Commissioner of dated 04.07.2025 and decide the same within a period of one to the petitioner and his family VINOD KUMAR 2025.07.31 10:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document