- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34140 RSA No. 938 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 01ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL No.938 OF 2022 (PAR) BETWEEN: SRI HONNUREGOWDA S/O LATE D RAMEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS R/AT B KATIHALLI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI, HASSAN TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT-573201. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. SHIVAKUMAR P, ADVOCATE -ABSENT) AND: 1. SMT SHOBHA W/O MOHAN KUMAR AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS R/AT B KATIHALLI KOPPALU KASABA HOBLI HASSAN TALUK-573201. 2. SRI CHANNAKESHAVEGOWDA S/O LATE D RAMEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS R/AT B KATIHALLI KOPPALU KASABA HOBLI, HASSAN TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT-573201. …RESPONDENTS THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 08.02.2022 PASSED IN RA.NO.94/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, HASSAN, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 23.09.2017 PASSED IN O.S No.161/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HASSAN. Digitally signed by MALATESH K C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34140 RSA No. 938 of 2022 THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER None present for the appellant even in third round of calling of cases. 2. The order sheet depicts that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal diligently. Appeal is of the year 2022 yet to be admitted. 4. Noting the absence of learned counsel for the appellant on previous date of hearing, this Court, suo motu granted adjournment till today on the condition of payment of cost of Rs.500/- to the High Court Legal Services Committee. 5. Despite granting sufficient opportunity, neither cost is paid nor learned counsel for the appellant appeared before the Court. 6. Taking note of the same, appeal stands dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE kcm/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 52