Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 80446 (PNJ)

MANGAT SINGH v. GURPREET SINGH KHAIRA AND ORS

COCP/2667/2023 · 2025-09-24

Nidhi Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

COCP-2667 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 213 Mangat Ram Gurpreet Singh Khaira and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) 1. dated 02.06.2023 of this Court in Punjab and others 2. Ms. Preeti Yadav, Collector respondent learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. submits that in compliance of order dated speaking order dated have taken the possession of the of possession dated out by learned counsel for the respondent that only demarcation of Khasra 2667-2023 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP Date of Decision: Mangat Ram Versus Gurpreet Singh Khaira and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Ms. Bhumika Khatri, Advocate for Mr. HS Saini, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG, Punjab. NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been filed alleging violation of order 02.06.2023 (Annexure P-4) passed by of this Court in CWP-12893-2023, titled as Punjab and others’. Short reply dated 19.09.2025 Ms. Preeti Yadav, Collector-Deputy Commissioner, Patiala on behalf of respondent 2 is taken on record. A copy thereof, has been supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner. At the very outset, learned counsel for th submits that in compliance of order dated speaking order dated 07.08.2024 has been passed and the respondents have taken the possession of the shamlat land of possession dated 21.11.2024 (Annexure R out by learned counsel for the respondent that only demarcation of Khasra IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-2667-2023 Date of Decision: 24.09.2025 .… Petitioner .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Ms. Bhumika Khatri, Advocate for Mr. HS Saini, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG, Punjab. The present petition has been filed alleging violation of order by the Hon’ble Division Bench , titled as ‘Mangat Ram vs. State of 19.09.2025 by way of affidavit of Deputy Commissioner, Patiala on behalf of 2 is taken on record. A copy thereof, has been supplied to At the very outset, learned counsel for the respondents submits that in compliance of order dated 02.06.2023 (Annexure P-4), 07.08.2024 has been passed and the respondents land, as is evident from warrants (Annexure R-1). It is very fairly pointed out by learned counsel for the respondent that only demarcation of Khasra The present petition has been filed alleging violation of order Division Bench State of by way of affidavit of Deputy Commissioner, Patiala on behalf of , 07.08.2024 has been passed and the respondents as is evident from warrants . It is very fairly pointed out by learned counsel for the respondent that only demarcation of Khasra RISHU KATARIA 2025.09.25 19:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. COCP-2667 No. 63 was remaining and the respondents out the demarcation of Khasra No. 63 respondent 4. above, the order dated 02.06.2023 (Annexure P with and nothing survives in the present petition; disposed of. 5. 6. required to be passed; and the present petition is hereby 7. 8. 24.09.2025 rishu 2667-2023 -2- 63 was remaining and the respondents the demarcation of Khasra No. 63 ndents thus, submits that nothing survives in the present petition. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the above, the order dated 02.06.2023 (Annexure P with and nothing survives in the present petition; disposed of. Heard. In view of the facts noted above, no further direction is required to be passed; and the present petition is hereby Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall also .09.2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable 63 was remaining and the respondents are in the process of carrying the demarcation of Khasra No. 63. Learned counsel for the thus, submits that nothing survives in the present petition. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the above, the order dated 02.06.2023 (Annexure P-4) stands duly complied with and nothing survives in the present petition; and the same may be In view of the facts noted above, no further direction is required to be passed; and the present petition is hereby disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No are in the process of carrying . Learned counsel for the Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the 4) stands duly complied and the same may be In view of the facts noted above, no further direction is RISHU KATARIA 2025.09.25 19:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.