PREETI VERMA ALIAS RAJNI VERMA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
NA529/2491/2025 · 2025-07-30
Nalin Kumar Srivastava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 80437 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 80437 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:128529 Court No. - 83 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 2491 of 2025 Applicant :- Preeti Verma Alias Rajni Verma And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Pawankumar Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.
1. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed with a prayer to direct the court concerned to decide the Case No. 802 of 2023 under Sections 126(2) of Cr.P.C., Police Station- Kotwali, District- Shahjahanpur pending in the Court of learned Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Shahjahanpur expeditiously within stipulated period. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants as well as learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicants that the applicant no.1 is the aggrieved wife and applicant no.2 is the minor daughter of opposite party no.2. They have obtained a judgement in their favour under Section 125 Cr.P.C. by the learned trial Court on 11.1.2011 since the actual relief was not given to them by opposite party no.2. It is further submitted that the applicant no.1 again moved an application under Section 127 Cr.P.C. in the enhancement of the maintenance amount, which was also exparte decreed in her favour. Since no maintenance allowance was given by the opposite party no.2/ husband she was compelled to file an application under Section 126 (2) Cr.P.C., which is still pending. The Court concerned is not taking proper interest in disposal of the said case. 4. Learned AGA opposed the prayer. 5. I have considered the submissions and perused the record. 6. In the circumstances, the Court concerned is directed to make all endeavours to decide the aforesaid case expeditiously preferably within a period of one year from the date of production of certified copy of this order before it, keeping in view the heavy work load in the said Court. 7. It is also made clear that the Court / Presiding Officer is not the only stake holder in the trial and disposal of a case, hence, besides the P.O. concerned, all the stake holders i.e. police and executive authorities, counsels, parties to the case, staff etc. are also made bound by this order and it will be their responsibility also to assist the Court in every manner for the expeditious disposal of this case. 8.
With the above observations, the application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 31.7.2025//Fhd Digitally signed by :- FAHAD NIYAZ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad