MISS POOJA AND OTHERS v. THE STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER
CRMMO/172/2025 · 2025-09-16
Virender Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8043 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8043 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2025:HHC:31760 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA Cr.MMO No.172 of 2025 Date of Decision: 16.09.2025 Pooja & Ors. …Petitioners Versus State of H.P. & Anr.
…..Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners : Mr. M.C. Bhardwaj, Advocate, vice Mr. R.S. Jaswal, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr.
Mohinder
Zharaick, Additional Advocate General, with Ms. Ranjna Patial, Deputy Advocate
General,
for respondent No.1. None for respondent No.2. Virender Singh,
Judge
(Oral) The present petition has been filed for quashing of FIR in question, on the basis of the compromise. However, respondent No.2, despite service, has not bothered to put appearance.
2. Considering the said fact, learned vice counsel appearing for the petitioners under instructions, submits that the petitioners do not want to proceed further in this case and wants to withdraw the present petition, with liberty to file fresh one. Permission granted. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
( 2025:HHC:31760 )
3. In view of the above submission, leave and liberty, as prayed for, is granted to the present petitioners.
4. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed, as withdrawn, so also the pending application(s), if any.
(Virender Singh)
Judge September 16, 2025 (subhash)