Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 80429 (KAR)

SRI. THIMMARAJU v. SRI. T. JAYARAM

RFA/208/2022 · 2025-07-31

K S Hemalekha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29669 RFA No. 208 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 208 OF 2022 (PAR/DEC) BETWEEN: SRI THIMMARAJU S/O THAMMAIAH AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.90, SARAKKI AGRAHARA, J.P.NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560078 …APPELLANT (BY SRI SHRIDHARA K., ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND: 1. SRI T.JAYARAM S/O LATE THAMMAIAH AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS R/AT NO.90, 14TH CROSS, 15TH MAIN, SARAKKI AGARAHARA, J.P.NAGAR, BENGALURU – 560078. 2. SMT. PREMA W/O LATE SRINIVAS AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS 3. SRI PUNEET S/O LATE SRINIVSS AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS BOTH R2 AND R3 ARE RESIDING AT NO.217 Digitally signed by MAHALAKSHMI B M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29669 RFA No. 208 of 2022 4TH CROSS, 33RD MAIN, SARAKKI GARDEN, J.P.NAGAR, VI PHASE, BENGALURU – 560078. 4. SRI T.RAJANNA S/O THAMMAIAH AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS 5. SRI NARAYANASWAMY S/O THAMMAIAH AGED ABOUT 82 YEARS BOTH R4 AND R5 ARE RESIDING AT No.90, SARAKKI AGRAHARA, J.P.NAGARA, BENGALURU-560078. 6. SRI VEERATHIMMAIAH @ EARATHIMMAIAH S/O RANGAPPA AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS 7. SMT RANGAMMA W/O SHRI VEERATHIMMAIAH AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS 8. SRI ARAVINDAKUMAR V., S/O SRI VEERATHIMMAIAH @ EARTHIMMAIAH AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS R6 TO R8 ARE RESIDING AT No.65, J.P.NAGARA, 2ND PHASE, 15TH CROSS, 15TH MAIN, BENGALURU - 560078. 9. SRI VENKATASHAMAPPA SINCE REP. BY LRS. (AS RESPONDENT NO.9 TO 14) SRI PRAKASH S/O SRI VENKATASHAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29669 RFA No. 208 of 2022 10. SRI RAVI S/O VENKATASHAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS 11. SRI RAMAMURTHY, S/O VENKATASHAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, 12. SRI LAKSHMANA S/O VENKATASHAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS 13. SRI SRINIVAS S/O VENKATASHAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS 14. SRI KRISHNA S/O VENKATASHAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS R9 TO R14 ARE RESIDING AT SARAKKI AGRAHARA, J.P. NAGARA, BENGALURU - 560078. 15. SRI V.SHANTHARAJU S/O VENKATASHAMAPPA R/AT FLAT NO.002, PRUTHVI CLASSIC APARTMENT, 20TH ‘A’ MAIN, SMS LAYOUT, J.P.NAGARA V PHASE BENGALURU – 560078. 16. SMT. LAKSHMAMMA W/O NARASIMHA MURTHY AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS R/AT NO 33/1, 1ST MAIN ROAD, KATTIGENAHALLI, BENGALURU NORTH, BENGALURU - 560012 17. SMT. SUMITHRA W/O ERANNA - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29669 RFA No. 208 of 2022 AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS CHOGALAGATTI, BENGALURU NORTH, BENGALURU - 560012 …RESPONDENTS THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 04.10.2021 PASSED IN OS.NO. 8227/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU, DISMISSING THE SUIT AND COUNTER CLAIM FOR PARTITION AND SEPARATE POSSESSION. THIS RFA, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA ORAL JUDGMENT There is no representation on behalf of the appellant. 2. From the order sheets it is found that several times the appellant was granted time to comply with the office objection. Today i.e., 31.07.2025, the matter is listed for non-compliance of office objection for the 9th time. Neither the office objections are complied nor the appellant’s counsel is present. - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29669 RFA No. 208 of 2022 3. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- _____________________ JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA AT List No.: 1 Sl No.: 26