HARSHPRABHA BAIRWA W/O KULDEEP SINGH BANSIWAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/2764/2025 · 2025-02-24
Sameer Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8040 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8040 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:8157] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2763/2025 Ray Singh Meena S/o Sukhram Meena, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Village Muckandpura, Post Lalpura, Tehsil Lalsot, District Dausa, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner.
3. The District Education Officer (Headquarter), Secondary Education, Dausa.
4. Principal, Govt. Sr. Secondary School, Gol, Lalsot, Dausa. ----Respondents With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2764/2025 Harshprabha Bairwa W/o Kuldeep Singh Bansiwal, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Vpo Garhmohan, Block Nadoti, District Gangapur City, Rajasthan. Presently Working On The Post Of Teacher Gr. Iii Level I At Govt. Primary School, Kandhi Ki Dhani, Block Gudamalani, District Barmer, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Director, Elementary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner.
3. The District Education Officer, Elementary Education (Headquarter), Barmer. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini Mr. Aamir Khan For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment 24/02/2025
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that petitioners are aggrieved of the transfer orders, which is dehors
[2025:RJ-JP:8157] (2 of 2) [CW-2763/2025] the policy of the State. Further, learned counsel has submitted that petitioners have filed representations (Annexure-3 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2763/2025 & Annexure-1 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2764/2025) in this regard, however, the same is not considered till date.
2. Heard and considered.
3. This Court directs the competent authority/respondents to consider the abovesaid representation of the petitioners and decide the same within a period of 30 days from the date of passing of this order, strictly in accordance with law, as per the ratio encapsulated in Pawan Meena vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (SBCWP No. 1665/2024; Neutral Citation: 2024:RJ- JP:5792) and Circular issued by the Chief Secretary for the State of Rajasthan, dated 19.02.2024 (No. i- 10¼1½ izlq-@vuqq-&1@2012).
4. In light of the aforestated, the present petitions are disposed of with abovesaid directions. Pending applications, if any, stand
disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK/135-136