Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 80386 (PNJ)

JAGJEET SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRWP/7790/2025 · 2025-07-21

Sandeep Moudgil

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

167 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-7790-2025 DECIDED ON: 21.07.2025 JAGJEET SINGH .....PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS .....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. Vikramjeet Singh , Advocate for Mr. Gourave Bhayyie Gilhotra, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Jasjit Singh Rattu, DAG Punjab SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL) The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of directions to official respondents no. 1 to 6 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner and his family from respondent No. 7 to 16 as the petitioner was brutally attacked at his farm by private respondents in a planned manner on 31.05.2025, where Balbir Singh respondent no.7 put a pistol to his ear and moreover they hit him with the "gandasa” on his face due to which his lip was torn apart and his teeth were also broken by them, copy of MLR is attached herewith as Annexure P-3 and moreover, petitioner anticipates similar attacks in future and the police is hand in gloves with the private respondents and no action has been taken qua the attack and injuries suffered by the petitioner till date despite various representations and written complaints dated 17.06.2025 (Annexure P-2). MEENU 2025.07.22 10:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-7790-2025 -2- Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he will be satisfied in case a direction be issued to respondent No.3 to look into the representation dated 17.06.2025 (Annexure P-2) , within a time bound manner. In view of the above, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3/Senior Superintendent of Police, Sangrur to look into the representation dated 17.06.2025 (Annexure P-2) and decide the same after providing an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and by passing a speaking order in accordance with law within a period of two weeks. A copy of order so passed be supplied to the petitioner within one week thereafter. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) 21.07.2025 JUDGE Meenu Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable :Yes/No MEENU 2025.07.22 10:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document