Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 80384 (ALL)

COMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT BABU JAGAN PRASAD BAIJNATH SANSKRIT MAHAVIDYALAY v. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

WRIC/25208/2025 · 2025-07-30

Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:128167 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 25208 of 2025 Petitioner :- Committee Of Management Babu Jagan Prasad Baijnath Sanskrit Mahavidyalay Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ramesh Chandra Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Shesh Kumar Srivastava Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking for the following relief:- " i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no.1 to consider for sanctioning 3 posts of Sanskrit Teacher in view of the government order dated 31.01.1985 and further one post of Clerk and Peon respectively in view of the government order dated 11.08.2015 issued by the State Government. ii. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature mandamus directing the respondents to consider and pass appropriate order on the representation made by the petitioner regarding sanctioning the three post of Sanskrit Teacher, one post of Clerk and one post of Peon in view of the government order dated 31.01.1985." 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner without entering into the merits of the case made innocuous prayer that he may be permitted to file fresh representation before respondent no.1 and a direction may be issued to him to decide the same in time bound manner. 3. Sri Santosh Kumar, learned standing counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents and Sri Shesh Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.5 vehemently opposed the petition on merit, but they have not opposed the prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. 4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Sri Santosh Kumar, learned Standing Counsel, Sri Shesh Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.5 and perused the contents made in the writ petition. 5. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner as no objection made by learned counsel for the respondents. Petitioner is directed to file a fresh representation along with the present writ petition and certified copy of this order before respondent no.1 Additional Chief Secretary, Secondary Education, U.P., Lucknow within 10 days. After receiving the said representation, the respondent no.1 is directed to decide the said representation in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of the said representation. 6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 31.7.2025 AKT (Chandra Dhari Singh, J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad