ROSHAN NISHAD ALIAS RAM LAKHAN NISHAD ALIAS PHUPHA v. STATE OF U.P.
BAIL/26496/2025 · 2025-07-31
Krishan Pahal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 80383 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 80383 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:129379 Court No. - 65 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 26496 of 2025 Applicant :- Roshan Nishad Alias Ram Lakhan Nishad Alias Phupha Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Dharm Singh Parmar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Dharm Singh Parmar, learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri Ashutosh Srivastava, learned AGA for the State and perused the material placed on record. 3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No. 186 of 2025, under Section 3(1) of U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station - Maudaha, District - Hamirpur, during the pendency of trial. 4. It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the prosecution under the Gangsters Act has been launched against the applicant on the basis of two criminal cases shown in the gang chart in which he has already been enlarged on bail by the court concerned. Criminal history of one another case has been assigned to the applicant which has been explained in the affidavit filed along with bail application. He has been falsely implicated in the present case due to police rivalry. He is not a member of any gang. The applicant is not a previous convict. The applicant is languishing in jail since 27.05.2025 and in case, he is enlarged on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and shall cooperate with trial. 5. Per contra, learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the bail prayer of the applicant. 6. Without expressing any opinion on the merits, the bail application is allowed. Let the applicant Roshan Nishad Alias Ram Lakhan Nishad Alias Phupha, involved in aforesaid crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two
sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions that :- i. The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial. ii. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment. iii. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail. 7. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.
Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted. Order Date:- 1.8.2025 Siddhant (Justice Krishan Pahal) Digitally signed by :- SIDDHANT SAHU High Court of Judicature at Allahabad