Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 80381 (ALL)

CHAIN PAL SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/10783/2025 · 2025-07-30

Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:127720 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 10783 of 2025 Petitioner :- Chain Pal Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Babu Lal Ram,Santosh Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking the following main prayer:- "I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to fix the salary of the petitioner as Rs.27,600/- per month, after fixation of Salary as Rs.27,600/- the monthly pension of the petitioner be released Rs. 42,000/- per month and the arrears of the pension also be provided to the applicant. II. to Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents, to decide and consider the representation dated 06.01.2025 of the petitioner with regard to fix the salary of the petitioner as Rs.27,600/- per month and after fixation of salary as Rs.27,600/- per month as Rs.42,000/- be released as well as with regard to provide arrears of pension to the petitioner." 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner without entering into merits of the case, made an innocuous prayer that the petitioner may be permitted to file a fresh representation before respondent no.2 and a direction may be issued to him to decide the same in time bound manner. 3. Learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State- respondents vehemently opposed the writ petition on merits, but has not opposed the innocuous prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. 4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Sri Jitendra Singh, learned Standing Counsel appeared on advance accepted notice on behalf of the State-respondents, perused the contents made in the writ petition and the documents on record. 5. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as no objection made on behalf of learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents. Petitioner is directed to file a fresh representation along with present writ petition as well as certified copy of this order before respondent no.2 within 10 days from the date of production of certified copy of this order. After receiving the said representation, respondent no.2, District Inspector of Schools, Baghpat is directed to decide the said representation in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receiving of the said representation. 6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. . (Chandra Dhari Singh, J.) Order Date :- 31.7.2025 Atul Digitally signed by :- ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad