- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37413 WP No. 28485 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO.28485 OF 2025 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: 1. N. VASUDEVA REDDY AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS OLD S/O. P. NANJA REDDY #75/13, LALBAGH MAIN ROAD HULKUL COMPLEX, LALBAGH MAIN ROAD BENGALURU SOUTH, BENGALURU WILSON GARDEN KARNATAKA – 560 027 2. R. DEVRAJ AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS S/O. RAJANNA NADAGOWDAGOLLAHALLI DODDAGUBBI, BENGALURU KARNATAKA – 562 149 3. R. BHARATH RAJ AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS S/O. D. RAJENDRA KUMAR #2192, B. M. LAYOUT, DEVIRAMANAHALLI NANAJANGUD, MYSURU KARNATAKA – 571 301 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI ARNAV A. BAGALWADI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37413 WP No. 28485 of 2025 DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, M. S. BUILDING, BENGALURU–560001 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BENGALURU NORTH SUB-DIVISION K. G. ROAD, BENGALURU–560009. 3. THE TAHSILDAR YELAHANKA TALUK BENGALURU – 560 063 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B. P. RADHA, A.G.A.) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENDORSEMENT DATED 12.09.2024 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT, VIDE BEARING NO.LND(JALA) C.R:125/2025-26 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE A AND DIRECT THE 3RD RESPONDENT TO IMPLEMENT THE ORDER PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT AND FORTHWITH MUTATE THE NAMES OF THE PETITIONERS HEREIN VIDE ANNEXURE N BEARING NO.RA/YLK-101/2025 DATED 30.07.2025. THIS WRIT PETITION IS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo dated 18.09.2025 seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the petition, while also seeking liberty to raise a challenge - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37413 WP No. 28485 of 2025 to the endorsement dated 12.09.2025 at Annexure-A before the competent authority. 2. The memo is taken on record, subject to all just exceptions. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn while reserving liberty to the petitioner to approach the competent authority. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE KLY CT:VC