2025:UHC:6873 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS BA1/1088/2025 Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Ayush Tyagi, learned counsel (through V.C.) and Mr. Siddhant Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. Sandeep Sharma, learned A.G.A. with Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Present applicant Yashpal, S/o Ramesh is praying for bail in reference to FIR dated 08.02.2024, bearing FIR No. 61 of 2024, registered at P.S. Jhabrera, District Haridwar which was lodged against unknown person for the offence punishable under Section 420 IPC. On completion of investigation three persons including present applicant were charge sheeted for the offences punishable under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 120B read with Section 201 IPC. 4. It is contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated which is evident from the fact that FIR was lodged against unknown person and thereafter during investigation on the disclosure by the other accused name of the present applicant came into light. He further submits that charge sheet has already been filed on 08.02.2025, therefore, at this juncture there is no need of custodial interrogation of the present applicant. Apart from this, he submits that the applicant has no previous criminal history. He further submits that the other co-accused, namely, Jatin Kumar has already been granted bail by this Court on 01.08.2025. 5. On the other side, learned State 2025:UHC:6873 Counsel have not disputed that charge sheet has already been filed and the applicant has no previous criminal history and other co-accused has already been granted bail. 6. After hearing the arguments of the learned counsel for the parties and further taking into consideration the fact that charge sheet has already been filed , and, as such, there is no need of custodial interrogation of the applicant, and other co-accused has already been granted bail by this Court, therefore, Court is of the view that the applicant deserves for bail. 7. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the bail application is allowed. 8. Let the applicant Yashpal be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 05.08.2025 Parul 2025:UHC:6873