APHC010084052019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 3688/2019 Between: 1. V. NAGESWARA RAO, S/O V. VENKATA RAMANA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/O. 37-11-31/A, P.R.R. GARDENS, INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, VISAKHAPATNAM (URBAN), VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY, VISAKHAPATNAM. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, V TOWN POLICE STATION, KANCHARAPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 4. DOGGA RAMUNAIDU, S/O NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O. DOGGAVANIPALEM, PENDURTHY, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 5. B VARALAKSHMI, W/O LATE SRIRAMA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O. TATICHETLAPALEM, KAILASAPURAM, VISAKHAPATNAM-530 024, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 6. PAILA SRINIVASA RAO, S/O SOMULU, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/O. ATCHUTAPURAM (MO), ATCHUTAPURAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 2 7. B TEJA, S/O LATE SRIRAMA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, R/O. TATICHETLAPALEM, KAILASAPURAM, VISAKHAPATNAM-530 024, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 8. REDDY NAGESWARA RAO, S/O NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/O. DOGGAVANIPALEM, PENDURTHY, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT 9. GORLE LAKSHMI, W/O R. NAGESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, R/O. MAMIDIPALLI VILLAGE, DEVARAPALLI MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. RAJESH MATCHA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.3688 OF 2019 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “….to direct the respondents 2 and 3 to forthwith register a crime against the respondents 4 to 9 basing on the complaint lodged by the petitioner dt.02.03.2019 and take appropriate action on the same, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition, and pass…” 2. Learned counsel representing Sri Rajesh Matcha, learned counsel for the writ petitioner would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication, and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 3. Learned Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 4. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 01.08.2025 Pmk 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:3688 OF 2019 Date: 01.08.2025 Pmk