Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 80347 (MAD)

R.JOTHIKA v. THE CHAIRMAN

WP/29483/2025 · 2025-08-07

C Kumarappan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.No.29483 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 07.08.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN W.P.No.29483 of 2025 R.Jothika ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Chairman, TANGEDCO, NPKRR Maaligai, No.144, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002. 2.The Chief Engineer (Personnel) TANGEDCO, NPKRR Maaligai, No.144, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002. 3.The District Collector, Tiruvallur District, Tiruvallur – 602 001. 4.The Chief Engineer (Generation), North Chennai Thermal Power Station, Minjur High Road, Athipattu Pudu Nagar, Chennai – 600 120. ... Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents No.1 and 2 to provide employment on the basis of the petitioner's representation 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.29483 of 2025 dated 30.06.2025. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Ramana Reddy For Respondents : M/s.Kurthana S.B. for R1, R2 and R4 For M/s.ADVIT Law Chambers Mr.N.Naveen Kumar for R3 Government Advocate O R D E R M/s.Kurthana S.B., learned counsel takes notice on behalf of the respondents 1, 2 and 4. Mr.N.Naveen Kumar, learned Government Advocate takes notice on behalf of the third respondent By consent, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself. 2.The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to provide employment on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 30.06.2025. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner sent representation claiming seniority on 30.06.2025 and such representation is pending with the respondents. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.29483 of 2025 4.At this juncture, the learned counsel appearing for the respondents 1, 2 and 4 and the learned Government Advocate would submit that the respondents would consider the petitioner's representation according to its own merits and in accordance with law, within a reasonable time. 5.In such view of the submission, without going into the merits of the writ petition, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the respondents to consider the above representation of the petitioner upon its own merits and in accordance with law and pass orders, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6.The writ petition is disposed of. No costs. 07.08.2025 pri Index: Yes/ No Speaking Order: Yes/ No NCC: Yes/ No 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.29483 of 2025 C.KUMARAPPAN,J. pri To 1.The Chairman, TANGEDCO, NPKRR Maaligai, No.144, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002. 2.The Chief Engineer (Personnel) TANGEDCO, NPKRR Maaligai, No.144, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002. 3.The District Collector, Tiruvallur District, Tiruvallur – 602 001. 4.The Chief Engineer (Generation), North Chennai Thermal Power Station, Minjur High Road, Athipattu Pudu Nagar, Chennai – 600 120. W.P.No.29483 of 2025 07.08.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis