- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41142 WP No. 4594 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 4594 OF 2023 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. ALLAH BAKSH S/O SYED KHADER SAB AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS R/AT SIDDAPURA VILLAGE NANDAGUDI HOBLI, HOSAKOTE TALUK BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT PIN CODE - 562 122 … PETITIONER (BY SRI. M S MUKARRAM., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPTS BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT M S BUILDING AMBEDKAR BEEDHI BANGALORE - 560 001 2. TAHSILDAR HOSKOTE TALUK HOSKOTE - 562 114 3. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER DODDABALLAPUR SUB DIVISION DODDABALLAPUR - 561 203 Digitally signed by VIJAYA P Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41142 WP No. 4594 of 2023 4. THE CHAIRMAN STATE OF WAKF BOARD NO 6, CUNNINGHAM ROAD VASANTHA NAGAR BANGALORE - 560 051 … RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHAMANTH NAIK, HCGP FOR R1 TO R3; R4 - SERVED) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASHING ANNEXURE-A DATED 17.06.2022, THE ENDORSEMENT ISSUED BY THE R2 IN RRT/JA/CR.126/2016-17 IN RESPECT OF SY.NO.104 MEASURING 8 ACRE OUT OF 9 ACRES 24 GUNTAS, SITUATED AT NIDAGATTA VILLAGE, JADIGENHALLI HOBLI, HOSAKOTE TALUK AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo which reads as hereunder: "The petitioner above named humbly submit before this Hon'ble Court that the Petitioner has filed the above writ petition challenging the impugned order passed by the Assistant Commissioner, Doddaballapura, dated 24.03.2022 in LND(RA)1/2019. However it is learnt by legal advise that the proper forum to challenge the - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41142 WP No. 4594 of 2023 impugned order is before Deputy Commissioner, Doddaballapura under Section 136(3) of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964, hence the above writ petition may kindly be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the same before the Deputy Commissioner, Doddaballapura, by condoning the delay in the ends of justice and equity. Hence, this memo. 2. In light of the memo filed, petition is dismissed. Liberty to challenge the impugned order is reserved. Time spent before this Court may be taken note, in the event any question of limitation to challenge the impugned order arises. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE VP