Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Manipur · body

2025 DAILYLAW 803 (MAN)

State of Manipur v. Court on its own motion and 4 ors

MC(PIL)/9/2025 · 2025-03-19

Golmei Gaiphulshillu Kabui

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

P a g e | 1 Items No. 55-57 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL PIL No. 24 of 2017 Court on its own motion Petitioner Vs. State of Manipur Respondent With MC(PIL) No. 14 of 2019 With MC(PIL) No. 6 of 2025 BEFORE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. D. KRISHNAKUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. GUNESHWAR SHARMA ORDER 21.04.2025 (D. Krishnakumar, C.J) : [1] Mr. I. Denning, learned Amicus Curiae is present; Mr. M. Rarry, learned senior counsel, appears for the applicant in MC(PIL) No. 6 of 2025 and Mr. H. Kenajit, learned counsel, appears for the Loktak Development Authority; Mr. N. Gautam appears on behalf of Mr. Boboy Potsangbam, learned CGSC, appears on behalf of the Union of India. [2] Mr. M. Rarry, learned senior counsel seeks 1 (one) week time to file reply to the report submitted by the Amicus Curiae. [3] In the report submitted by the Amicus Curiae, it is seen that the local body, namely, the Moirang Municipal Council, Moirang dumped the waste materials in the proposed site of the construction of resort and therefore, they are violating the interim order passed by this Court. Hence, the said local body i.e., the Moirang SHAMURAILATPAM SUSHIL SHARMA Digitally signed by SHAMURAILATPAM SUSHIL SHARMA Date: 2025.04.22 15:39:13 +05'30' P a g e | 2 Municipal Council, Moirang is impleaded as necessary party in the present PIL and this Court also issues show cause notice to the Executive Officer of the Moirang Municipal Council, Moirang to submit explanation for violating the court’s order and to that effect, submit an explanation in the form of affidavit before this Court on the next date of hearing. [4] Post the matters on 28.04.2025. JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Sushil