IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.77543 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-426 Year-2024 Thana- BIDUPUR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Subodh Kumar, Son of Uma Ray, Resident of Majhauli, P.S. - Bidupur, District - Vaishali, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Prince Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Binod Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 3 18-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Bidupur P.S. Case No.426 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 191(3), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 109, 329(3), 303(2) of the B.N.S. 3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with four others being armed with lathi-danda arrived and assaulted the informant due to which he got injured. When the wife and daughter-in-law came to rescue, they were also being assaulted. Further, allegation against this petitioner is that he has snatched the golden chain of the daughter-in-law of the informant. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77543 of 2024(3) dt.18-01-2025 2/2 offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. From prusal of the F.I.R., it is clear that the nature of allegation is general and omnibus. Only specific allegation agaisnt this petitioner is that he has snatched the golden chain, which seems to be super addition. During course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner has also submitted that a panchayati was held but the informant has despite that panchayati filed the case. A statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 20.08.2024. 5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State. 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur, in connection with Bidupur P.S. Case No.426 of 2024. lata/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T