Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 80263 (ALL)

SIYYAD TAHIR ALI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 12 OTHERS

WRIC/25115/2025 · 2025-07-30

Rohit Ranjan Agarwal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:128206 Court No. - 34 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 25115 of 2025 Petitioner :- Siyyad Tahir Ali Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 12 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Manoj Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J. 1. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that proceedings initiated under Section 38 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 by petitioner had culminated into passing of final order. The private respondents had filed a restoration application in which a stay application was moved and on the stay application, an interim order has been passed. The petitioner is aggrieved by the interim order. 2. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to private respondents, with a direction upon officer concerned to decide the restoration application pending in Case No. RST/11169 of 2019, Computerized Case No. T201905310311169, in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of one month, from the date of production of certified copy of this order. 3. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of. 4. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. Order Date :- 31.7.2025 V.S.Singh Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad