HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 25052 of 2025 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. 1. After arguing at some length, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, without entering into merits of the case, made an innocuous prayer that the petitioners may be permitted to represent their case before the respondent no. 6/Chaudhary Charan Singh University, Meerut and the respondent no. 6 may be directed to decide the said representation in accordance with law in time bound manner. 2. Learned counsel on behalf of respondents vehemently opposed the petition on merits, but has not opposed the innocuous prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners. 3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State respondents no. 1 to 3, Sri Vaibhav Tripathi, learned counsel for the respondent no. 4 and Sri Avneesh Tripathi, learned counsel for respondent nos. 5, 6,7 and 9 and perused the contents made in the writ petition and the documents on record. 4. Taking into consideration of the submissions made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and no objection made on behalf of learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents, I am of the view that the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners may be allowed. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioners is directed to approach the respondent no.6 by way of filing a detailed representation raising all the grounds which have been taken by him here in this writ petition within Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Saroj Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : Avneesh Tripathi, C.S.C., Vaibhav Tripathi Self Finance College Fedration And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 8 Others .....Respondent(s) one week from the date of production of certified copy of this order. After receiving the said representation, the respondent no. 6 is directed to pass a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law on the said representation, after taking into consideration of counselling which is going on and after verifying the teachers, staff and all other facilities as required, expeditiously preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of receiving of the said representation. 6. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the writ petition is disposed of. September 9, 2025 Pratima WRIC No. 25052 of 2025 2 (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRATIMA AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad