Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 80247 (PAT)

Kishor Singh @ kishor kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./77539/2024 · 2025-02-24

Anjani Kumar Sharan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.77539 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-163 Year-2024 Thana- BARAULI District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Kishor Singh @ kishor kumar Singh Son Of Late Laxman Singh Resident of village-Bada vdeya, P.S-Barauli, District-Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Baidhyanath Thakur For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Mritunjay Kumar Nirala ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 4 24-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Barauli P.S. Case No.163 of 2024, registered for the offence punishable u/s 304B, 506, 34 and 120B of the IPC. 3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and other co- accused persons are said to have killed the daughter of the informant due to non-fulfillment of demand for dowry. 4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has not committed any offence as alleged in the FIR. He has been falsely implicated in this case. There is no allegation of demand of dowry levelled against the petitioner. The petitioner is the husband of the deceased and there is no specific overt act against him. The wife of the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77539 of 2024(4) dt.24-02-2025 2/2 petitioner died due to illness. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent and has been rotting in judicial custody since 16.07.2024. 5. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case as well as considering the nature of offence, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for grant of bail on his behalf is hereby rejected. 7. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. 8. However, petitioner is at liberty to renew his prayer for bail after examination of the informant. shikha/- (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) U