Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 80242 (KAR)

SMT. C. PADMABAI v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/8384/2022 · 2025-11-20

E S Indiresh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47951 WP No. 8384 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 8384 OF 2022 (GM-SLUM) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. C. PADMABAI W/O. LATE MANJUNATH SINGH, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, WIDOW, RESIDING AT NO.22, 15TH CROSS, 8TH MAIN ROAD, BANDAPPA GARDEN, MUTHYALANAGAR, BANGALORE-560 054. 2. SMT. SUNDARAMMA W/O. LATE SHIVALINGA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, STREET VENDOR, RESIDING AT NO. 795, 4TH MAIN, A BLOCK, 2ND STAGE, RAJAJINAGAR, BANGALORE-560 010. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. HARSHA D JOSHI., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, VIDHANA SOUDHA, Digitally signed by ARUNKUMAR M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47951 WP No. 8384 of 2022 BENGALURU-560 001. 2. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001. 3. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT, BANGALORE-562 159. 4. KARNATAKA SLUM DEVELOPMENT BOARD SHESHADRIPURAM, BENGALURU-560 020, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHANTESH SHETTAR, AGA FOR R1 TO R3; SRI. B N SURESH BABU, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R4 HEREIN TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONERS AS IN ANNEXURE-F DATED 23.12.2021 AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47951 WP No. 8384 of 2022 ORAL ORDER Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. In this writ petition, the grievance of the petitioners pertains to the non-consideration of the representation dated 23.12.2021 (Annexure-F) by respondent No. 4. 3. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, respondent No. 4 is directed to consider the said representation dated 23.12.2021 and pass appropriate orders within an outer limit of four months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SB: List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7