RAJESH DHOBI S/O LATE SH. MANGAL RAM v. M/S KHADI GRAM UDYOG MANDAL AMARSAR
CMAP/28/2025 · 2025-03-06
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8024 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8024 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:10236] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Application No.28/2025 IN S.B. Civil Second Appeal No.57/2023
1. Rajesh Dhobi S/o Late Sh. Mangal Ram, Aged 47 Years, R/o Shop No. A, Plot No. S-6-B, Sulaniya Bhawan, Kabir Marg, Bani Park Jaipur
2. Chotu Dhobi S/o Sh. Late Mangal Ram, Aged 45 Years, R/o Shop No. A, Plot No. S-6-B, Sulaniya Bhawan, Kabir Marg, Bani Park Jaipur
3. Sanjay Dhobi S/o Sh. Late Mangal Ram, Aged 42 Years, R/o Shop No. A, Plot No. S-6-B, Sulaniya Bhawan, Kabir Marg, Bani Park Jaipur
4. Pooranmal Dhobi S/o Sh. Late Mangal Ram, Aged 41 Years, R/o Shop No. A, Plot No. S-6-B, Sulaniya Bhawan, Kabir Marg, Bani Park Jaipur
5. Smt. Lali Devi W/o Sh. Late Mangal Ram, R/o Shop No. A, Plot No. S-6-B, Sulaniya Bhawan, Kabir Marg, Bani Park Jaipur
6. Smt. Shushila W/o Late Sh. Jaidev Dhobi, Aged 51 Years, R/o Shop No. A, Plot No. S-6-B, Sulaniya Bhawan, Kabir Marg, Bani Park Jaipur
7. Kumari Rekha D/o Late Sh. Jaidev, Aged 28 Years, R/o Shop No. A, Plot No. S-6-B, Sulaniya Bhawan, Kabir Marg, Bani Park Jaipur
8. Ajay S/o Late Sh. Jaidev, Aged 24 Years, R/o Shop No. A, Plot No. S-6-B, Sulaniya Bhawan, Kabir Marg, Bani Park Jaipur
9. Vijay S/o Late Sh. Jaidev, Aged 22 Years, R/o Shop No. A, Plot No. S-6-B, Sulaniya Bhawan, Kabir Marg, Bani Park Jaipur ----Applicants/Defendants Versus M/s Khadi Gram Udyog Mandal Amarsar, Bapu Basti, Amarsar, District Jaipur Through Its Maanad Mantri Bhanwar Lal Verma, R/o Plot No. S-6-B, Sulaniya Bhawan Kabir Marg, Banipark, Jaipur.
[2025:RJ-JP:10236] (2 of 2) [CMAP-28/2025] ----Non-Applicant/plaintiff For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Akshay Singh For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
Judgment / Order 06/03/2025 This application is filed by the applicants/defendants seeking extension of time granted by this Court vide order dated 07.08.2023 for vacation of the rented premises.
Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the time for vacation may be extended suitably in view of their financial and medical condition. He, therefore, prays that the application be allowed and the time granted by this Court vide order dated 07.08.2023 for vacation of the rented premises be extended by a period of six months. Heard. Considered. The S.B. Civil Second Appeal No.57/2023 preferred by the applicants, was dismissed as not pressed by this Court vide order dated 07.08.2023. However, they were granted time till 25.02.2025 to vacate the subject premises on their request which was accepted by learned counsel for the respondent subject to terms and conditions mentioned therein. Since, the applicants have already been granted sufficient time to vacate the rented premises, no case is made out for its extension. The application is dismissed accordingly.
(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J YOGESH/166