BALWINDER KAUR ALIAS BALBIR KAUR AND OTHERS v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CRM-M/38441/2025 · 2025-08-26
Yashvir Singh Rathor
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 80233 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 80233 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRM-M-38441-2025
- 1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 289 CRM-M-38441-2025 Date of decision: 26.08.2025 BALWINDER KAUR ALIAS BALBIR KAUR AND OTHERS ....Petitioners Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
...Respondents CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR
Present : Mr. S.S. Brar, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Rahul Jindal, AAG, Punjab. Mr. M.S. Chauhan, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 5.
YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR. J.(Oral)
1. Prayer in this petition filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 is for quashing of F.I.R. No.63 dated 29.05.2025, registered under Sections 109, 191(3), 190, 126, 304(2) of BNS registered at Police Station Bahawala, District Fazilka and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise.
2. This Court vide order dated 24.07.2025 had directed the parties to appear before the Trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send his/her report qua the genuineness of the compromise.
3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties had appeared before learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Abohar and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, learned Magistrate has submitted report dated 08.08.2025 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties AMANDEEP GOSAIN 2025.08.27 19:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment
CRM-M-38441-2025
- 2-
voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence.
4. Learned State counsel as well as learned counsel for respondents No.2 to 5 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties.
5. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant F.I.R. following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 titled as “Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another” and approved by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in (2012) 10 SCC 303 titled as “Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others”, this petition is allowed and F.I.R. No.63 dated 29.05.2025, registered under Sections 109, 191(3), 190, 126, 304(2) of BNS registered at Police Station Bahawala, District Fazilka and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom qua petitioner(s), are hereby quashed.
(YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR) 26.08.2025
JUDGE amandeep Whether speaking/reasoned. : Yes/No Whether Reportable. : Yes/No AMANDEEP GOSAIN 2025.08.27 19:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment