Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8023 (RAJ)

KALU KABADI ALIAS MOIN S/O INAYAT HUSAIN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/2612/2025 · 2025-04-07

Anil Kumar Upman

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:15386] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2612/2025 Kalu Kabadi Alias Moin S/o Inayat Husain, Aged About 47 Years, R/o Inter Colony Chechat, Police Station Chechat, District Kota (Raj.). (Presently Confined In Sub Jail At Ramganj Mandi). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajveer Singh Jhala For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 07/04/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.34/2025 registered at Police Station Chechat, District Kota Rural (Rajasthan) for the offence punishable under Section 8/21 of NDPS Act. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that false recovery of 8 gms of smack has been shown from the possession of the petitioner. Admittedly, recovered contraband is below commercial quantity. Counsel submits that charge-sheet has been filed in this matter. Petitioner is in custody since 30.01.2025 and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by [2025:RJ-JP:15386] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-2612/2025] counsel for the petitioner. She submits that petitioner is habitual offender and 33 other cases have been registered against him. 4. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that most of the cases registered against the petitioner are under Section 13 of Rajasthan Public Gambling Ordinance, 1949 and only one case has been registered against the petitioner under the NDPS Act. 5. I have considered the contentions. 6. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, as also the fact that alleged recovered contraband is below commercial quantity; charge-sheet has been filed in this matter as well as looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow this bail application. 7. The bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner- Kalu Kabadi Alias Moin S/o Inayat Husain shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 8. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence in every week in the concerned police station. [2025:RJ-JP:15386] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-2612/2025] 9. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial court to cancel the bail granted to him by this Court. 10. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioner. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /166