Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8023 (AP)

D SAVITHRI v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/5137/2020 · 2025-09-14

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010083922020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 5137/2020 Between: D SAVITHRI, W/O. LATE VENKATANNA, AGE 77 YEARS, OCC. PENSIONER, R/O. KOTHAGUDEM VILLAGE, UNGUTURU MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, , WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT AT ELURU. 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHEBROLE P.S., WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. B SESIBUSHAN RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus to declare tile action the of the Respondent No.3 in not concluding the investigation in Crime No.2 of 2020 for the offence under Sec. 324, 323, 506 r/w. 34 IPC as arbitrary and violation of section 173 (1) of CrPC consequently direct the 3rd Respondent to conclude the investigation in Crime No.2 of 2020 for the offence under Sec. 324, 323, 506 r/w. 34 IPC.” 2 2. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that, Police had taken up investigation in Crime No.2 of 2020 on the file of Chebrole Police Station for the offences under Sections 324, 323 and 506 read with 34 IPC and after completion of investigation, filed charge sheet on the file of the Court of Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Tadepalligudem which was numbered as C.C.No.284 of 2020. Hence, no further orders are required in this matter and the petition may be disposed of. 3. Sri B.Sesi Bushan Rao, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit, recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:15.09.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.5137 of 2020 Dt.15.09.2025 Dinesh