- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:1663 WP No. 106967 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 106967 OF 2024 (S-DIS) BETWEEN: MOHAMMED GHOUSE S/O. MOHAMMED IBRAHIM, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, OCC. ODD. FDA, CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, BALLARI, R/O. DOOR NO.84, WARD NO.29, MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEE COLONY, BEHIND FOREST GUEST HOUSE, BELGAL CROSS, BALLARI -583102. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SABEEL AHMED, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, R/BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU -560001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER, CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION BALLARI GADAGI CHENNAPPA CIRCLE, ROYAL CIRCLE, BALLARI -583101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. KIRTHILATHA R. PATIL, HCGP FOR R1, SRI. S.S.CHALAWADI, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA IS PRAYING TO, ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT FOR QUASHING THE IMPUGNED SUSPENSION ORDERS BEARING NO. MANAPABA/SIBBANDI/SHAAKE/C.R/AMANATTU/01/2024-25/5188 DATED 02-09-2024 PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT AS PER ANNEXURE-C AND THE SAME IS ARBITRARY IN NATURE.B) CONSEQUENTLY, ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT OR ORDER DIRECTING AND 2ND RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER REPRESENTATION AT Digitally signed by VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:1663 WP No. 106967 of 2024 ANNEXURE-E DATED 30-09-2024. PASS SUCH OTHER ORDER/ORDERS, DIRECTIONS AS THIS HON BLE COURT DEEMS FIT IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE INCLUDING AN ORDER AS TO THE COSTS OF THE PRESENT WRIT PETITION, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA) 1. This question in the case at hand with regard to placing the petitioner under suspension. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent has now placed on record, the order of revocation of suspension dated 24.01.2025. 3. In that light the petition is rendered infructuous. The petitioner shall become entitled to all the consequential benefits in the light of the revocation of the order of suspension and reinstatement. 4. In the light of the said order, the petition does not survive for any further consideration except the aforesaid observations. Ordered accordingly Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE RHR/- List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21