SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS BA1 No.1071 of 2025 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Ramji Shrivastava, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. Siddhartha Bisht, learned AGA for the State. 3. Present applicant–Shekhar S/o Praveen is seeking regular bail in relation to first information report dated 11.08.2020 bearing FIR No.0502 of 2025, Police Station Manglore, District Haridwar, wherein the present applicant along with his father Praveen alias Lallu, his mother Virmala, his sisters Soni and Shikha have been implicated for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 323, 504, 354(A), 376 and 511 of IPC. 4. It is contended by learned counsel for the applicant that this is absolutely a false case and concocted story has been alleged in the FIR and this is case of glaring example of malicious prosecution. 5. He further submits that not only this, in reference to the allegations as alleged, the applicant’s parents and his two sisters were also implicated. Apart from this, he submits that the charge-sheet was filed in a very casual manner based on the statement of the victim. 6. He further submits that the other co- accused, the parents and the sisters of the applicant, have already been enlarged on bail and the applicant was arrested on 27.05.2025. 7. He also submits that prior to this, the applicant filed a criminal writ petition bearing WPCRL No.1290 of 2020, wherein interim protection was granted on 20.08.2020, but since the charge-sheet was filed, writ petition rendered infructuous. 8. On the other side, Mr. Sandeep Sharma, learned AGA have not disputed this fact that the charge-sheet has already been filed and the other co-accused have already been enlarged on bail, therefore, there is no need of custodial interrogation of the present applicant. 9. After hearing the arguments as advanced by learned counsel for the parties and further taking into consideration that the charge-sheet has already been filed and the other co-accused have already been enlarged on bail, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserve for bail. 10. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, the instant bail application is allowed. 11. Let the applicant, namely, Shekhar S/o Praveen, be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 11.08.2025 R.Bisht