Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8020 (JHR)

MADAN KUMAR ALIAS MADAN RAJAK v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./2162/2025 · 2025-04-03

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:JHHC:10311 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.2162 of 2025 ------ Madan Kumar @ Madan Rajak, aged about 36 years, son of Surendra Rajak, resident of Village Purnanagar, P.O. and P.S. Koderma, District Koderma (Jharkhand) .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Anurag Kumar, Advocate Mr. Sanjay Kr. Pandey, Advocate For the State : Mr. Vineet Kr. Vashistha, Spl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-03-04-2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No.30 of 2025 instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 33/41/42 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner is the husband of the owner of the Tata Magic Van which was seized by police while transporting illegally excavated stone chips. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. Drawing attention of this court towards para-12 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned Spl.P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrendering, he will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.10,000/- as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Koderma in connection with Complaint Case No.30 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/