- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:54564 WP No. 38508 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA WRIT PETITION NO. 38508 OF 2025 (CS-RES) BETWEEN: 1. K Y VENKATASWAMY S/O K.V. YALLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/A 234, AMBEDKAR COLONY, ANUGONDANAHALLI HOBLI, KALKUNTE AGRAHARA, HOSKOTE TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-560067. 2. K M VENKATESH, S/O MUNIVENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/A 173, KALKUNTE AGRAHARA, HOSKOTE TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-560067 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SRIKANTH NV.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. D P MANJUNATH, S/O PARERA RANGANTH AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, IN CHARGE PRINCIPAL, R/A ANUGONDANAHALLI HOBLI, HOSAKOTE TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT - 560117. 2. SHIVA KESHAVA REDDY, S/O H.R. KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, Digitally signed by PRASHANTH N V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:54564 WP No. 38508 of 2025 R/A D. HOSAHALLI, ANUGONDANAHALLI HOBLI, HOSAKOTE TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT - 560117 PRESIDENT OF SRI RANGANATHA RURAL EDUCATION SOCIETY KALKUNTE. 3. T.K. MANJUNATH S/O KRISHNAPPA, AGE ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/A THATHANOOR, HOSAKOTE TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT - 560117 SECRETARY OF SRI RANGANATHA RURAL EDUCATION SOCIETY KALKUNTE. 4. RADHAKRISHNA S/O VENKATARAMANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/A YADAGONDANAHALLI, HOSAKOTE TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT -560117 TREASURER OF SRI RANGANATHA RURAL EDUCATION SOCIETY KALKUNTE. …RESPONDENTS THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED MEETING NOTICE DATED 12.12.2025 ISSUED BY THE R3 AS PER ANNEXURE-A. GRANT AN INTERIM PRAYER TO STAY THE IMPUGNED MEETING NOTICE DATED 12/12/2025 ISSUED BY THE R3 AS PER ANNEXURE-A AND ETC,. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:54564 WP No. 38508 of 2025 ORAL ORDER Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. It is noticed that the petitioners are not seeking any relief against the State. Under such circumstances, they cannot seek issuance of writ in the nature of certiorari to quash the impugned meeting notice dated 12.12.2025 issued by respondent No.3 produced as per Annexure-A. Secondly, it is stated that petitioner No.1 is the Vice-President and petitioner No.2 is the Director of a registered society. The Society is also not a party in this petition. 3. In view of the above, the petition does not survive for consideration. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. In view of dismissal of main petition, pending interlocutory application does not survive for consideration and accordingly, the same is disposed off. SD/- (M G UMA) JUDGE PNV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8