SMT RATHMAMMA v. M/S TALUK AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE CO OPERATIVE MARKETING SOCIETY LTD
CRP/356/2021 · 2025-12-10
V Srishananda
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 80172 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 80172 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52181 CRP No. 356 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 356 OF 2021 (SC) BETWEEN:
1.
SMT RATHMAMMA W/O LATE VENUGOPAL AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS R/AT NO.15 GROUND FLOOR 3RD CROSS, PRIYADARSHININAGAR AYYAPPA MAIN ROAD, K R PURAM BANGALORE 560 036.
2.
SMT V BHARATHI D/O LATE VENUGOPAL W/O DR CHADNRA MOHAN AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS R/AT BEHIND OLD COURT NEAR 7 HILLS SCHOOL BAGEPALLI TOWN 571 207.
3.
SRI V PRAKASH S/O LATE VENUGOPALA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS R/AT YELEPETE CROSS KORAMARAPETE CHICKABALLAPUR 562 101.
…PETITIONERS (BY SRI. S A SUDHINDRA., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
M/S TALUK AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE CO OPERATIVE MARKETING SOCIETY LTD CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.,
Digitally signed by HEMALATHA A Location: HIGH COURTOF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52181 CRP No. 356 of 2021
A) B B ROAD, CHICKBALLAPUR 562 101 REP BY ITS THE PRESIDENT AVALAREDDY AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS.
B) THE SECRETARY SRI N SHIVA LINGAPPA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.V VINOD REDDY, ADVOCATE FOR R1(A):
R1(B) THE SECRETARY, SERVED)
THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 18 OF THE KARNATAKA SMALL CAUSES COURT ACT AND R/W SECTION 115 OF THE CPC, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS OF THE SUIT BEARING SC NO.4/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM AT CHICKBALLAPUR, AND SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED: 09.11.2020 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDE AND CJM AT CHICKBALLAPUR IN S.C.4/2012 AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
ORAL ORDER Heard Sri S.A.Sudindra and Sri V.Vinod Reddy.
2. After addressing the arguments, a memo came to be filed. Memo reads as under:
“The petitioner humbly prays this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to stay as tenant till 31.01.2026 and the petitioner shall undertake to vacate the premises and hand over the key of the shop to the respondent on
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52181 CRP No. 356 of 2021
31.01.2026. Same may be taken on record in the interest of justice and equity.”
3. Placing the memo on record, revision petition stands dismissed. However, time is extended till 31.01.2026 to vacate and hand over the premises subject to payment of the rents at the rate of Rs.1,100/- per month and subject to landlord recovering the arrears of rent as agreed between the parties.
Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE
CM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 37