Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 80168 (KAR)

SIDDAGANGAMMA v. BHAGYA

MFA/5841/2021 · 2025-08-14

Lok Adalath

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF AUGUST 2025 CONCILIATORS PRESENT: THE HON’BLE SRI. JUSTICE K.V.ARAVIND & SRI. PAVANA CHANDRA SHETTY.H, MEMBER M.F.A.No.5841/2021 (MV) (Lok Adalat No.5545/2025) BETWEEN 1 . SIDDAGANGAMMA AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS W/O LATE GANGANNA, 2 . CHANDANA V.G. AGED ABOUT 12 YEARS, S/O LATE GANGANNA, 3 . SIDDALINGAIAH V.G. AGED ABOUT 9 YEARS, S/O LATE GANGANNA, APPELLANTS NO.2 AND 3 ARE REP. BY GUARDIAN MOTHER APPELLANT NO.1, 4 . BHYRANNA AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS, S/O CHIKKANNA, 5 . KADARAMMA 2 AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS, W/O BHYRANNA, ALL ARE R/AT VARADENAHALLI, AMMANAGHATTA POST, KASABA HOBLI, GUBBI TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT- 572 122 ...APPELLANTS (BY SRI.MUSHTAQ AHMED, ADVOCATE) AND 1 . BHAGYA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, W/O CHENNEGOWDA, R/AT NO.07, HEROHALLI, MAGADI ROAD, VISHWANEEDAM POST, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT- 560 086. 2 . THE GENERAL MANAGER SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., E8, EPIP, SITAPURA JAIPUR, RAJASTHAN- 302022, INDIA, SERVICE CENTER AT. BRANCH OFFICE, NO.5, 3RD FLOOR, MONARCH CHAMBERS, OPP. INFANTRY WEDDING HALL, INFANTRY ROAD, BANGALORE- 560 001. REP. BY ITS MANAGER. RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B.C. SHIVANNE GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R.2) 3 MFA FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 04.06.2016 PASSED IN MVC NO.876/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, ADDITIONAL MACT-17, GUBBI, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED: CONCILIATION ORDER The learned Counsel appearing for the Appellants - Claimants is present. The learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent – Insurance Company along with its representative is present. 2. After prolonged negotiations, the matter is settled. A joint memo signed by the learned advocate appearing for the appellants/claimants (being authorized by the appellants/claimants to sign) and the learned advocate appearing for the respondent-Insurance Company and its authorized officer is filed. The appellants-claimants have agreed to receive and the respondent - Insurance Company has agreed to pay a lump-sum of Rs.9,15,200/- (Rupees Nine Lakh Fifteen Thousand Two Hundred only), in addition to what has been awarded by the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim. 4 3. The Respondent - Insurance Company has agreed to deposit the said amount before the Tribunal within six weeks from the date of preparation of award, failing which, the said amount shall carry interest at the rate of 9% P.A. from the date of default, till the date of deposit. 4. The apportionment, deposit and release of the enhanced compensation amount shall be made in terms of the Judgment and Award passed by the Claims Tribunal. 5. This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint memo. The Judgment and Award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. Draw up the Award accordingly. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER SRK