Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 80167 (KAR)

MS PRIYANKA C v. UNION BANK OF INDIA

COMAP/261/2024 · 2025-10-29

Anu Sivaraman, Vijaykumar A Patil

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO. 261 OF 2024 (MON) BETWEEN 1 . MS. PRIYANKA C., D/O CHIKKANNA V., AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, 2 . SRI CHIKKANNA V., S/O LATE VENKATARAM, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, APPELLANT NOS. 1 AND 2 ARE R/AT NO. 52/53, SAI RAM NILAYA, 3RD CROSS, PATTANAGERE MAIN ROAD, R. R. NAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 098. 3 . SMT. LAKSHMI NAGARAJA, W/O LATE NAGARAJU, R/AT NO. 95, SRINIVAS NILAYA, …2 COMAP NO.261/2024 2 VINAYAKA NAGAR, PWD COLONY, KOLAR CITY, KOLAR DISTRICT - 560 037. ...APPELLANT/S (By Sri/Smt.: MADHU S. B., ADVOCATE) AND UNION BANK OF INDIA, (ERSTWHILE CORPORATION BANK), BASAVANAGUDI BRANCH, NO 6, GANDHI BAZAR, BASAVANAGUDI, BANGALORE - 560 004, WORKING AS CHIEF MANAGER, SMT. K. SUREKHAKUMARI, W/O SURESH V. HEDGE, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, e mail id cb069@corpbank.co.in IFSC CODE: CORP0000069. …RESPONDENT/S The Advocate for the appellant has filed the above COMAP / Commercial Appeal under section 96 of code of civil procedure Praying that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to set aside the judgment and decree dated 29/11/2023 passed by the LXXXVIII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge (Exclusive Commercial Court), Bangalore (CCH 89) in COM. OS No. 7234/2019 (ANNEXURE-A) and also pass suitable orders if this Honorable court may deems fit, in the interest of justice and equity. …3 COMAP NO.261/2024 3 This Commercial Appeal coming on for Orders, this day the Court made the following order. ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) Finally, two weeks time is granted to comply with the office objections, failing which, the appeal shall stand rejected without reference to the Bench. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE NOTE : Vide Court Order dated 29.10.2025, the office objections are not complied with. Hence, the appeal is hereby rejected. COPY Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T By : SR R By : VS C By : GS Ty dt : 11.12.2025 C.dt : 17.12.2025