2025:UHC:3522-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI G. NARENDAR AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK MAHRA WRIT PETITION (M/B) NO. 398 OF 2025 23rd JUNE, 2025 Manvendra Singh …… Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand And Others …… Respondents Presence:- Mr. Bilal Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. P.C. Bisht, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State. --------------------------------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble The Chief Justice Sri G. Narendar) Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State. 2. Learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel would submit that petitioner is vested with an alternate remedy of revision under Rule 78 of the Uttarakhand Minor Mineral (Concession) Rules. 3. The submission is placed on record. 1 2025:UHC:3522-DB 4. The writ petition is not maintainable in view of the availability of an alternative and efficacious remedy of revision. 5. The writ petition stands disposed of by reserving liberty to the petitioner to avail of the revisional remedy. In the event, the revision is filed within two weeks from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order, the same shall not be rejected on the ground of delay. ________________ G. NARENDAR, C.J. ____________ ALOK MAHRA, J. Dt: 23rd June, 2025 Ujjwal 2