Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8013 (BOM)

VENKATRAO PATIL GRAMIN VIKAS AND SHIKSHAN PRATISHTAN THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT v. THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETORY AND OTHERS

WP/1723/2025 · 2025-02-05

Shri Mangesh S Patil, Shri Prafulla S Khubalkar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1723.25wp (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 969 WRIT PETITION NO. 1723 OF 2025 VENKATRAO PATIL GRAMIN VIKAS AND SHIKSHAN PRATISHTAN THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETORY AND OTHERS …. Mr Mulla Shabbeer Akbarbadshaha, Advocate for petitioner Mr R. R. Bangar, Standing Counsel for respondent No.1 Mr A. V. Lavte, A.G.P. for respondent Nos.2 to 4 Mr Nitin S. Kadam, Advocate for respondent No.5 CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL AND PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, JJ. DATE : 5th February, 2025 PER COURT: 1. The petitioner/institution is seeking reimbursement under Section 12 of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 in respect of the students admitted in its school under that Act. 2. Issue notice to the respondents, returnable forthwith. Learned Standing Counsel for Union of India waives service of notice on behalf of respondent No.1. Learned A.G.P. waives service of notice 2025:BHC-AUG:3447-DB 1723.25wp (2) on behalf of respondent Nos.2 to 4. Learned advocate Mr Kadam waives service of notice on behalf of respondent No.5. 3. The respondents shall undertake necessary inquiry in the light of the petitioner’s claim, as expeditiously as possible and in any case within a period of six weeks. If the petitioner is found entitled to have some reimbursement, it shall be disbursed to it within six weeks thereafter. 4. The writ petition is disposed of. (PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.) (MANGESH S. PATIL, J.) sjk