- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47628 WP No. 16646 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 16646 OF 2025 (L-KSRTC) BETWEEN: SRI. ANWAR KHAN, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, (NOT CLAIMING THE SENIOR CITIZENSHIP) RESIDING AT NO. 196, 4TH MAIN, 6TH CROSS, SHAMANNA GARDEN, NEW GUDDADAHALLI EXTENSION, BENGALURU-560026. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SRINIVASA MURTHY S.R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION/BMTC SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 027. 2. THE CHIEF LAW OFFICER KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION/BMTC SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 027. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SREENIVAS, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. B.L.SANJEEV, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. Digitally signed by THEJAS KUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47628 WP No. 16646 of 2025 THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Srinivasa Murthy.S.R., counsel for the petitioner and Sri.Sreenivas., counsel on behalf of Sri.B.L.Sanjeev., for the respondents have appeared in person. 2. The captioned Writ Petition is filed seeking following reliefs. (a) Respondents are directed to implement Annexure-A in the Industrial Dispute No.254/2021 vide order dated:05.08.2021 passed by the Industrial Tribunal, Bengaluru. (b) Issue a Writ of Mandamus directing to consider the representation dated:02.11.2021 vide Annexure-B as well as representation dated:04.02.2025 as per Annexure-C submitted to the respondent. 3. Counsel for the respective parties urged several contentions. Heard the arguments and perused the Writ papers with care. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47628 WP No. 16646 of 2025 4. Suffice it to note that the Industrial Tribunal vide award dated 05.08.2021 set aside the order of punishment. The petitioner is seeking implementation of the award by invoking the writ jurisdiction. Such a prayer cannot be accorded under Writ jurisdiction. I decline to exercise power under the Writ jurisdiction. If at all the petitioner has any grievance, he may take recourse under the law seeking implementation of the award in accordance with the law, if so advised. 5. Resultantly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. Because of dismissal of the Writ Petition, pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of and interim direction if any stands discharged. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 40