IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (122) CWP-20089-2025 Date of Decision : July 18, 2025 Ritika Yadav through her father & natural guardian Sh. Suresh Kumar .. Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others .. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Present: Mr. Chanderhas Yadav, Advocate, for the petitioner. HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that inadvertently the School with whom the security was deposited could not be impleaded as party in the present writ petition hence, the present writ petition may kindly be disposed of having been not pressed any further with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh one on the same cause of action with better particulars. 2. Ordered accordingly. July 18, 2025 (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) harsha JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No HARSHA RANI 2025.07.18 17:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document