Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:129061 Court No. - 9 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 8231 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ramdeni Respondent :- Nanhku Yadav And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Manoj Kumar Singh Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.
2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief:
"direct the court trial i.e. Civil Judge (S.D.), Ballia to expedite the Original Suit No.88 of 2025 (CNR No. UPBL050001352025) (Nanhku Yadav and others Vs. Ramdeni and Others), pending before him, expeditiously within stipulated period as may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court."
3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the aforesaid suit is pending since 2025. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously.
4. Prayer made in the writ petition can not be granted to the petitioner in view of the judgment passed by the Division Bench of this Court in Ali Shad Usmani v. Ali Isteba; 2015 (2) ADJ 250 (DB).
5. It has been further contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that an application for interim injunction (paper No. 6C) is pending consideration.
6. No useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.
7. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (S.D.), Ballia to consider and decide the interim injunction application (paper No. 6C) of the petitioner, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. Order Date :- 1.8.2025 Ved Prakash (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad