IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1892 of 2025 ------ 1. Rakesh Kumar Singh @ Rakesh Singh, aged about 39 years, 2. Ritesh Singh @ Ritesh Kumar Singh, aged about 39 years, Both sons of Manjhi Singh, resident of Village-Qr. No. 141, Street -9, BSL LH, P.O. & P.S.-B.S. City, Dist.-Bokaro … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Satish Prasad, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 24.03.2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending their arrest, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Sector-12 P.S. Case No.16 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under sections 147/148/149/323/324/307/504/506 of the Indian Penal Code. The Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners being members of unlawful assembly, in prosecution of the common object of the assembly attempted to murder- Pintu Kumar Saw. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioners are all false and drawing attention of this Court to the copy of the certified copy of the petition for compromise filed by the parties in the court of Sessions Judge, Bokaro in A.B.P. No. 114 of 2025, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that therein it has categorically been mentioned that the parties have compromised the case outside the court; with intervention of well-wishers and common friends and the informant does not want to proceed with the case any further. It is next submitted that there is no dispute between the parties and there was free fight between the parties and the petitioners had no intention to kill anybody. It is then submitted that the petitioners undertake to furnish sufficient security including cash security and also undertake to cooperate with the investigation of the case and further undertake that they will not annoy or disturb the informant, victims or any of their family members in any manner during the pendency of the case Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case where the abovenamed petitioners be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Hence, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, they shall be released on bail on depositing cash security of Rs. 20,000/- each and on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1st Class, Bokaro, in connection with Sector-12 P.S. Case No.16 of 2024 with the condition that the petitioners will cooperate with the investigation of the case and appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will furnish their mobile numbers and a copy of their Aadhar Cards in the court below with the undertaking that they will not change their mobile numbers during the pendency of the case with further condition that they will not annoy or disturb the informant, victims or any of their family members in any manner during the pendency of the case subject to the conditions laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Sonu/Gunjan-