CHEEKATLA CHIRANJEEVAMMA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
CRLRC/254/2025 · 2025-03-13
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8008 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8008 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
c=ises5ZS_eF5` IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMAR Lfl THURSDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE :PRESENT:
HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAl CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 254 OF 2025 Between: Cheekatla Chiranjeevamma, W/o. Cheekatia Yesu, R/o. H.No.10-138, Kondagudem Village, Kamavarapukota Mandal, E]uru District. ...Accused/Petitioner AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P, Amaravathi, Through SHO, Tadikalapudi Police Station, Eluru District.
2. Cheekatia Satish @ Pandu, S/o. Rajeswara rao, Age 31 yrs, R/o. Pathakondagudem Village, Kamavarapukota MandaI, Eluru District. ...Complainant/Respondent Revision filed under Section 438 & 442 of BNSS is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the memorandum of grounds filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be please'd to relax the conditions laid by the Court lN THE COURT OF SPECIAL JUDGE UNDER N.D.P.S. ACT-GUM I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, WEST GODAVARI, ELURU in Crl'.M.P. N6:409/2024 in Crime No.178/2024 of Tadikalapudi Police Station for handing over the interim custody of Bajaj Pulsar Motor Cycle bear~ing Registration No. AP 40 BK 0579, having chasis Number MD2A36FXOPCG35731 and Engine Number JLXCPG92137 Modelin the interest of justice. The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the memorandum of grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the
arguments of SRI J RAVI KUMAR Advocate for the Petitioner, and of PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent No.1, and the Court made the following
ORDER:
lN THE HIGl] COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATl (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND ll^/ENTY FIVE PF3ESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 254/2025 Between :
1.CHEEKATLA CHIRANJEEVAMMA, W/O CHEEKATIA YESU, R/O H.NO.10-138, KONDAGUDEM VILLAGE, KAMAVARAPUKOTA MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT ...PETITIONER •'AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA-PRADESH, REP BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A.P, AMARAVATHl, THROUGH SHO.TADIKALAPUDI POLICE STATION, 2.CHEEKATIA SATISH PANDu-, S/O RAJESWARA RAO. AGE 31YRS, R/O PATHAKONDAGUDEM` VILLAGE, KAMAVARAPUKOTA MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT, .MRESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.J RAVI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following:
ORDER: The instant Criminal Revision Case under Sections 438 and 442 of Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita Jhas been filed, by the' Petitioner, seeking to relax the condition imposed in Crl.M.P.No.409 of 2024, dated 04.10.2024 on the file of the Court of Special Judge under NDPS Act-Gum-I Additional District and Sessions Judge, West Godavari, EIuru.
2| Heard Sri J.Ravi Kumar, learned counsel for the Revision Petitioner and J, Ms.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor representing the state/Respondent.
3. Learned counsel for the Revision Petitioner would submit that the petitioner is a third party, who is no way connected to the alleged crime and her vehicle was taken away by the alleged Accused, who involved in Crime No.178 of 2024 of Tadikalapudi Police Station, which was registered for the offence under section 8(c) read with 20(b)('Ii)(C) of the Narcotic Drugs and psychotropic substances Act,1985. Learned counsel would further Submit that the petitioner has moved a petition before the special court v''de crl.M.P.No.409 of 2024 under Section 505 of BNSS seeking return Of the vehicle pending disposal of the crime. The learned Special Judge allowed the said petition with the condition to execute a personal bond for Rs.1,00,000/- with bank guarantee to be submitted at the time of release of the Vehicle,
Learned counsel would submit that, this condition may be modified tO the extent of furnishing sureties for Rs.75,000/-.
4. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor would submit that Court may Pass appropriate orders. 5- Considering the submissions made, the Criminal Revision Case iS Partly allowed and the condition of furnishing bank guarantee of Rs.1,OO,000/-is modified directing the petitioner to execute a personal bond for Rs-75,000/- with two sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction Of the learned
gr 3 special Judge. Except thl's, the remal-njng condl'tjons I'n the Impugned order I/ / hold good. E= .SD/-G.HELANAIDU ASSISTAN Fol /ITRUE COPY// ISTRAR OFFICER c-----. To,
1. The SHO, Tadikalapudi Poll'ce Station, EIuru district.
2. The Court of Special Judge under N.D.P.S. Act-Gum I Additional District and Sessions Judge, West Godavari, Eluru.
3. Cheekatia Satish @ Pandu, S/o. RaJ-eSWara raO, Age 31yrs, R/o. Pathakondagudem village, Kamavarapukota Mandal, Eluru District. (by RPAD)
4. One CC to SRI. J RAVI KUMAR, Advocate [OPUC]
5. Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]
6. One spare copy KN
J/
1| HIGH C'OURT Dr.VJP,J DATED..13/03/2025
ORDER CRLRC.No.254 of 2025 PARTLY ALLOWED *,gr ¥ \\ ELPR\\\5 (.} ® !j`:i_!`?f=; *`¥,I ±ft!Li-!®de§ F'-xp-co.`®. - + . \l.a =`=.-=r|. FTH±i=iEItEE±[ELZ=